Previous this week we reviewed Intel’s new Core i9-10900K and located that it was once a powerful performer, however it fell in need of impressing in an international ruled by way of AMD’s Ryzen lineup. For $500-ish it is much more pricey than the Ryzen 9 3900X, it is slower in maximum programs, whilst it carries a minor benefit in video games.

Finally, we could not actually say who would purchase 10900K. The extra reasonably priced Core i7-10700K despite the fact that, now this appears to be a extra attention-grabbing phase. Necessarily what we now have here’s a Core i9-9900K at a 25% bargain, as Intel has set the MSRP at $375. Even though you will be unable to instantly to find it at that value, it is a cheap bargain over the former gaming king, the 9900K which is able to nonetheless be discovered retailing for $530. However will that be sufficient?

The Core i7-10700K is an 8-core, 16-thread CPU, similar because the 9900K, however while the Espresso Lake phase includes a base clock of three.6 GHz, the 10700K would possibly not drop beneath 3.8 GHz and in consequence the TDP has been higher to 125 W. The spice up clock frequency has additionally been higher by way of 100 MHz, which sees the 10700K hit 5.1 GHz. L3 cache is going unchanged with each fashions wearing a 16 MB capability.

That is the 10700K in a nutshell, time to get into the benchmarks!

We examined all Ryzen processors the use of the Gigabyte X570 Aorus Grasp, eighth and Ninth-gen Intel processors have been benched at the Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Extremely, and the brand new Intel Tenth-gen Core CPUs at the Asus ROG Maximus XII Excessive. For this evaluate we are going to glance completely at effects for Intel CPUs that are not energy restricted, so no TDP restricted trying out. That is in most cases how we take a look at Intel CPUs, such because the 9900K, as an example, and this may be how nearly all of Z490 forums function out of the field. So whilst we’re going to be the use of the default clock multiplier tables, not one of the Intel CPUs are adhering to any energy limits.

What this implies for the 10700K is that beneath load the all-core clock velocity is 4.7 GHz and that frequency will likely be maintained throughout the take a look at. This is identical all-core clock frequency that the 9900K operates at. In the end, all configurations have been provided with a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, 32GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 reminiscence and a Corsair Hydro H150i Professional 360mm all-in-one liquid cooler.


As standard we’re going to get started with Cinebench R20 multi-core and right here we see that the 10700K is certainly in a position to check the 9900K, with a rating of 4985 pts. The two% building up we see is throughout the margin of error, even for our 3 run moderate.

When having a look at unmarried core efficiency we see that whilst the 10700K may be very robust, it is not remarkable, principally matching the 9900K, 3700X and 3900X.

Shifting directly to 7-zip compression efficiency, the 10700K is simply 1.5% sooner than the 3700X and 37% slower than the 3900X. With the 3900X lately promoting for approximately $415, it reigns the take a look at and has Intel appearing a big efficiency deficit to AMD on the similar value level.

Issues worsen for Intel within the decompression take a look at the place the 10700K is 9% slower than the 3700X and that puts it smartly in the back of the 3900X, shedding by way of a 39% margin.

The AES 256-bit encryption efficiency is attention-grabbing, as a result of right here we see that the 10700K is somewhat slower than the 9900K, trailing by way of a 6% margin. Given those two CPUs are an identical relating to specifications, however the 10700K clocks upper, that should not be imaginable. However the Comet Lake structure does introduce numerous {hardware} degree safety fixes and we noticed with Cascade Lake-X that this did every now and then scale back efficiency, so I consider that is what we are having a look at right here.

The 10700K was once additionally slower than the 9900K in Blender’s Open Knowledge benchmark, despite the fact that we are speaking a couple of seconds right here, so efficiency was once principally an identical.

The V-Ray efficiency may be very standard of what now we have noticed thus far. Right here the 10700K is 4% sooner than the 9900K and that supposed it was once virtually 30% slower than the Ryzen 9 3900X.

The 10700K carried out as anticipated in Corona, edging out the 9900K by way of a narrow margin. It was once additionally 14% sooner than the 3700X, however 24% slower than the 3900X. An anticipated end result however within the grand scheme of items, now not a specifically excellent end result for Intel.

Code compilation efficiency sees the 10700K simply edge forward of the 9900K, making it fairly slower than the 3700X and a whopping 33% slower than the 3900X. So once more efficiency is as anticipated, however in terms of severe productiveness paintings Intel seems outgunned by way of the competing Ryzen processors.

Shifting directly to DaVinci Unravel Studio efficiency, the 10700K is 6% sooner than the 9900K, permitting it to check the 3700X. That also noticed it are available in 9% slower than the 3900X, however that isn’t an enormous distinction, in spite of now not being an ideal end result.

The efficiency margins noticed in Premiere Professional are similar to the ones of DaVinci Unravel. The 10700K is in a position to fit the 3700X and that supposed it was once 6% sooner than the 9900K.

Intel’s upper clocked CPUs do carry out smartly in Photoshop and whilst the 10700K does not break the 3900X, a minimum of it is in a position to check it right here, and that’s the reason now not one thing now we have noticed a lot of.

Efficiency in After Results is moderate, in spite of the 10700K providing a 6% efficiency uplift over the 9900K. That supposed it was once nonetheless slower than the 3700X and 10% slower than the 3900X.

Shifting directly to energy intake, what we see listed below are general device intake numbers. The 10700K matched the 3900X at 230 watts and that suggests relating to efficiency according to watt Intel is at an important drawback, however that is under no circumstances information to any person at this level. Anyway, the 3900X was once 60% sooner than the 10700K in Blender, in order that’s an important benefit relating to efficiency according to watt.

Gaming Efficiency

Beginning with Battlefield V at 1080p the use of the extremely high quality preset, and naturally we are the use of an RTX 2080 Ti graphics card. Right here the 10700K matched the 9900K and 10900K to ship the most productive and maximum constant gaming revel in of the CPUs examined.

The 1% low efficiency was once 19% higher than what we see with the Third-gen Ryzen processors, in spite of the extra marginal distinction in moderate body charges. Nonetheless this can be a robust gaming end result for Intel and it is nice to look 9900K-like efficiency at a extra reasonably priced value.

In the event you play at 1440p, and I love to assume that is the minimal answer other people rocking an RTX 2080 Ti would goal, then the adaptation between the 10700K and the 3900X, as an example, is principally indistinguishable.

Subsequent up we now have A ways Cry New Morning time and once more we are having a look at 9900K or even 10900K-like efficiency with the 10700K. That is excellent information but additionally now not surprising. The A ways Cry collection has at all times liked Intel CPUs and we adore to incorporate it as this can be a worst case state of affairs for AMD. Whilst the 10700K will incessantly be round 5% sooner than the 3900X in gaming, there are titles corresponding to A ways Cry New Morning time the place Intel is round 15% sooner and that margin may also be noticed at 1440p.

Efficiency in Gears Ways additionally sees the 10700K fit the 9900K and 10900K, pumping out 138 fps on moderate to make it 8% sooner than the 3900X at 1080p. That margin is fairly diminished to six% at 1440p, despite the fact that the 1% low result’s now an identical, this means that the gaming revel in the use of both CPU will likely be indistinguishable.

Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege is a identify the place the 10900K was once in a position to distance itself from the 9900K, albeit by way of a small margin. This benefit was once made imaginable by way of the small building up in clock velocity and we see that benefit may be shared by way of the 10700K. We are most effective speaking a few 5% building up in 1% low efficiency despite the fact that.

That benefit disappears at 1440p, right here the 10700K is only a few frames sooner than the 3900X and once more that may see each processors ship the similar gaming revel in.

Ghost Recon Breakpoint additionally sees the 10700K fit the 10900K and by way of extension the 9900K, 9700K or even the 8700K. Once more, the 10700K was once sooner than the 3900X, however this time we are speaking about only a 5% efficiency benefit at 1080p.

The margins stay a lot the similar at 1440p, with the 10700K coming in 7% sooner than the 3900X.

In Shadow of the Tomb Raider the 10700K was once only a few frames off the tempo of the 10900K and about 6% sooner than the 3900X. Shifting to 1440p we discover that the 10700K is not any sooner than the 3900X, 3950X and 10900K, all handing over just about an identical efficiency.

The final recreation we examined, Pink Lifeless Redemption 2 presentations us a powerful GPU bottleneck at 1080p, in spite of the use of dialed down high quality settings. The 10700K averaged 103 fps which noticed it fit the 10900K, together with the 9900K, 9700K and 8700K. It was once additionally a couple of frames sooner than Ryzen 9 and seven processors.

The margins have been diminished at 1440p and now we see principally no distinction in efficiency between nearly all of the CPUs examined.

Taking a look on the moderate efficiency around the 7 video games examined at 1080p, we see that the 10700K is principally just like the 10900K and only a whisker sooner than the 9900K. The 9700K may be very shut within the moderate, however the 1% low efficiency was once lower than par.

When in comparison to the 3900X you are looking at a 7% development for the typical body price and an 8% development in 1% low efficiency. That is an inexpensive benefit for gaming.

Leaping as much as 1440p reduces the typical body price and 1% low margin to simply 5%, so whilst the 10700K is obviously sooner for gaming, it is not that a lot sooner and in maximum circumstances you will not realize the adaptation.

Superb for Gaming, However…

It is time to make sense of the knowledge. In a single aspect, that is very similar to what we noticed with the Core i9-10900K. The 10700K merely can not fit the price of the competing Ryzen portions in productiveness programs. The Core i7-10700K is both on par with the 3700X for a large 40% value top class or a lot slower than the 3900X for approximately the similar value.

That mentioned, the 10700K indubitably makes extra sense than the 10900K, because it gives the similar degree of gaming efficiency for round $100 much less. With that during thoughts, we stay up for trying out the Core i5-10600K that could be certainly one of Intel’s maximum compelling Tenth-gen merchandise. The 10600K is principally an overclocked 8700K and given the 8700K gives a equivalent degree of gaming efficiency to that of the 10700K and by way of extension the 10900K, this would be the CPU to get in case you are gaming completely. The 10600K is clearly extra reasonably priced at simply $280.

The 10700K and 10900K be afflicted by the truth that video games do not require greater than a 6-core, 12-thread processor in 2020 and we doubt that is going to switch anytime quickly. So if you wish to pass Intel for gaming, spending $100 or $200 extra on the ones Core i7 and Core i9 portions would possibly not make sense. And if you need each the gaming and the productiveness efficiency, Ryzen can quilt each fronts slightly convincingly. On the ~$400 value level there is merely no going previous the R9 3900X.

The 10700K is indubitably a excellent deal in comparison to the outgoing Core i9-9900K, however we must to find out first if the 10600K can be offering the similar gaming revel in at a far inexpensive value. Had Intel been in a position to supply the 10700K at $300 then it is indubitably one thing shall we counsel as a Ryzen 7 3700X choice, however at $375 or extra, it is a cross for now. Availability appears to be a key factor as we discussed with the 10900K, and whilst we have been in a position to buy this Core i7-10700K chip on liberate day, now we have been advised inventory is very restricted, so getting your fingers on one may turn out extraordinarily tricky.

Buying groceries Shortcuts:
  • AMD Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 9 3900X on Amazon
  • Intel Core i7-10700K on Amazon (quickly?)
  • Intel Core i5-10600K on Amazon (quickly?)
  • Intel Core i9-10900K on Amazon (quickly?)
  • AMD Ryzen 9 3950X on Amazon
  • AMD Ryzen 5 3600X on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2070 Tremendous on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX 2060 Tremendous on Amazon
In the event you experience our content material, please imagine subscribing.
  • Advert-free TechSpot revel in whilst supporting our paintings
  • Our promise: All reader contributions will pass towards investment extra content material
  • That suggests: Extra tech options, extra benchmarks and research