Saying part a dozen new 3-d NAND-based SSDs in August, Intel’s SSD 600p Collection specifically stuck our consideration for being an aggressively priced M.2 NVMe-based type focused on shopper desktops and notebooks.

The usage of 3-d TLC flash reminiscence evolved together with Micron, Intel has been ready to stay pricing in test and gives the 600p in capacities beginning at 128GB for $67 with sequential reads and writes of as much as 770MB/s and 450MB/s (1.8GB/s and 560 MB/s at the 1TB type).

Whilst that is slower than what we now have come to be expecting from M.2 NVMe drives, remember the fact that this collection is supposed to be reasonably priced.

When compared, the Samsung SSD 950 Professional is rated for a minimum of 2.2GB/s write speeds coupled with 900MB/s write for the 256GB type and 1.5GB/s for the 512GB model. Alternatively, what is essential to notice right here that the 950 Professional 256GB prices $187.

120 – 128GB 240 – 256GB 480 – 512GB 960/1TB
Intel SSD 600p $67
Intel SSD 750 Collection N/A N/A $300 (400GB)
$610 (800GB)
Samsung 950 Professional N/A $186
Samsung 850 Professional N/A $123
Samsung SSD 850 Evo N/A $100
Kingston UV400 $41
An important MX300 N/A $70 (275GB)
$120 (525GB)
$250 (1TB)

Kind of the similar amount of cash buys a 512GB model of Intel’s 600p. At simply $0.36 in keeping with gigabyte, the 600p 512GB seems to be remarkable worth, specifically whilst you imagine that the most cost effective TLC SATA 2.5″ drives price $0.24 in keeping with gigabyte and will have to be a just right bit slower. Now not most effective that, however in comparison to top rate SATA MLC drives such because the Samsung SSD 850 Professional, the Intel 600p continues to be fairly just a little less expensive.

Meet Intel’s 600p 512GB

As simply discussed, there are 4 capacities to choose between, regardless that we propose warding off the 128GB type as the fee in keeping with gigabyte on that one is reasonably prime. The 256GB and 512GB fashions are smartly priced and we’re nonetheless looking forward to the 1TB type to reach, regardless that we think it to be aggressive additionally.

The 512GB type is rated for a sequential learn and write velocity of 1775MB/s and 560MB/s, respectively, whilst its random learn IOPS are available at 155,000 with the write IOPS achieving 128,000. So once more, now not in the similar magnificence because the a lot more pricey NVMe drives comparable to Samsung’s 950 Professional, Toshiba’s OCZ RD400 and even Intel’s personal SSD 750 Collection.

Intel has controlled to even squeeze the 1TB type into the (2280) 80mm shape issue so compatibility in compact programs may not be a topic. All chips were positioned at the entrance facet of the PCB for the 512GB type we now have on-hand and we are ready to peer how the 1TB type might be configured.

Talking of chips onboard, we discover simply 3 IMFT 3-d TLC NAND flash reminiscence chips which as we discussed are significantly extra reasonably priced than an identical MLC chips. Having an abnormal selection of reminiscence chips turns out fairly peculiar regardless that it is smart right here. Each and every TLC chip options two dies stacked, therefore the ‘3-d NAND’. This implies every chip has a capability of 192GB which provides as much as a complete of 576GB permitting headroom for overprovisioning and a 17.5GB SLC cache. After all, additionally incorporated is a 2GB DDR3L-1600 DRAM cache.

Because of its just about infinite building price range, Intel’s firmware has controlled to keep away from the insects that plagued different manufacturers’ SSDs. Alternatively, an in-house Intel controller is not inside of this force, as you’ll have guessed.

Relatively, the corporate has opted for an not going candidate in Silicon Movement. In fact, this is not the primary time Intel has outsourced for an SSD controller because the SSD 510 sported a Marvell controller whilst the SSD 520 carried the debatable SandForce SF-2000.

Whilst we do not be expecting the Silicon Movement controller to undergo any problems, Intel has nevertheless taken a palms on way right here as evidenced via the original packaging and phase quantity. For just right measure, Intel has additionally stamped its emblem at the controller which has been completed with a covered copper warmth spreader on best that are supposed to lend a hand with warmth dissipation, a not unusual factor for M.2 SSDs.

The controller meets the NVMe 1.1 specification and as comparable to PCIe 3.0 x4 (4 Gb/s) bandwidth at its disposal. All of the same old stuff is on be offering right here comparable to TRIM, rubbish assortment and S.M.A.R.T. Additionally incorporated is an inner AES 256-bit {hardware} encryption engine however in contrast to the Intel SSD Professional 6000p Collection designed for industry customers, sped up eDrive or different encryption services and products in Home windows aren’t supported.

All 4 Intel 600p SSDs boast the similar five-year guaranty along side the similar 72-terabyte TBW staying power ranking, which is strange and we might normally be expecting the bigger fashions to have a better ranking.

How We Take a look at

As you most likely know, whilst producers declare spectacular top I/O efficiency out of the field, this efficiency can diminish over the years. Not like a traditional onerous force, any write operation made to an SSD is a two-step procedure: an information block will have to be erased after which written to. Clearly if the force is new and unused there might be not anything to erase and subsequently step one can also be bypassed, however this most effective occurs as soon as until the force is trimmed.

Bearing in mind this, we run the HD Tach complete benchmark a number of occasions to fill the force prior to checking out. This simulates heavy utilization and obviously signifies how efficiency might be affected after standard long-term use.

Maximum drives beef up the TRIM serve as, which is supposed to counteract those unwanted side effects.

Take a look at Machine Specifications

  • Intel Core i7-6700K
  • G.Ability 32GB (4x8GB) DDR4-3000
  • Asrock Z170 Extreme7+
  • GeForce GTX 1080
  • Silverstone Strider Collection (700w)
  • An important BX100 500GB
  • An important MX200 512GB
  • G.Ability Phoenix Blade PCIe SSD 480GB
  • Intel SSD 600p Collection 512GB
  • Intel SSD 750 Collection 400GB
  • Kingston HyperX Savage 480GB
  • Kingston Predator PCIe SSD 480GB
  • OCZ Trion 100 480GB
  • OCZ Vector 180 480GB
  • Plextor PX-G512M6e 512GB
  • Samsung SM951 512GB
  • Samsung SM951 NVMe 256GB
  • Samsung SSD 850 Evo 2TB
  • Samsung SSD 850 Evo 500GB
  • Samsung SSD 850 Professional 512GB
  • SanDisk Excessive Professional 480GB
  • Go beyond SSD370 512GB
  • Go beyond TS512GMTS800 512GB
  • Gainward GeForce GTX 980 (6144MB)


  • Home windows 10 Professional 64-bit
  • GeForce Sport In a position Motive force 372.90 – WHQL

Benchmarks: Document Reproduction Take a look at

Impressively, the Intel 600p matched the dearer 400GB 750 in our huge 6GB compressed document take a look at. This puts it smartly forward of the quickest SATA SSDs and now not some distance in the back of the mighty Samsung 950 Professional.

This system replica take a look at is produced from many small non-compressed information starting from simply 1K as much as 5000K in length (6104 information totalling 2.75GB). The efficiency right here could be very sudden because the 600p is nowhere to be observed. The throughput dropped to simply 159MB/s making the Intel 600p one of the crucial lowest SSDs we now have examined lately.

Our remaining document replica take a look at makes use of recreation knowledge in a mix of small and massive, compressed and non-compressed information. The Intel 600p returns to shape in our recreation replica take a look at with a throughput of 464MB/s, striking it more or less on par with the Kingston Predator. The efficiency right here is not thoughts blowing however it is applicable given the fee tag.

For those who revel in our content material, please imagine subscribing.
  • Advert-free TechSpot enjoy whilst supporting our paintings
  • Our promise: All reader contributions will pass towards investment extra content material
  • That implies: Extra tech options, extra benchmarks and research